学术造假英文报导

单个研讨人员学术造假英文报导

You are writing a paper and need to use some information to support your ideas, but you plan to make it up by yourself. You should think twice before doing this – you may be on your way to academic dishonesty.
你要写一篇论文，就需求用一些信息来支撑你的观念。但是，你却方案自行假造这些信息。这么做之前你可得三思 —— 由于你或许要构成学术失期。

On April 21, German publishing house Springer Nature announced that it took back 107 papers from its medical journal Tumor Biology because of academic dishonesty – a form of cheating which includes copying others’ work or making up references. All of the papers were from Chinese writers, according to The Beijing News. Some of them even study at top Chinese medical research centers, such as Huashan Hospital affiliated to Fudan University and Peking Union Medical College Hospital.
4月21日，德国出书社施普林格•天然宣告将撤下医学期刊《肿瘤生物学》上的107篇论文，原因是学术失期 —— 这是学术诈骗方式之一，包含抄袭别人著作、假造参考文献等行为。据《新京报》报导，一切被撤下的文章均由我国作者所编撰。其间一些作者乃至还在国内顶尖医学研讨中心进行研讨，如复旦大学隶属华山医院以及北京协和医院等。

The papers were taken back as they gave fake peer reviews, an important part of published papers. Peer reviewing is when work is reviewed by experts to make sure it’s correct before being submitted for publication. Springer Nature discovered that the email addresses used by the recalled papers’ peer reviewers were fake.
这些论文被撤回的原因是同行评议造假，这也是刊载论文很重要的一部分。同行评议即该文章需通过专家评定，以保证文章在上交出书时准确无误。施普林格•天然发现，在被撤回的论文中，同行评定人的邮箱地址是假的。

According to Hu Xingdou, a professor at the Beijing Institute of Technology, China’s academic evaluation system may be the reason for the high level of dishonest work.
北京理工大学教授胡星斗表明，我国的学术评价系统或许是论文造假猖狂的症结所在。

“In China, many academic institutions use the quantity of articles published by an academic as the standard of evaluation, which causes some research fellows to only chase the quantity instead of the quality of their study results,” Hu told the Global Times.
“在我国，不少学术组织将学者宣布的文章数量视作评价规范，导致了一些研讨同行只寻求研讨成果的数量而非质量，”胡星斗在承受《环球时报》采访时表明。

An unnamed doctor who has worked in Guangzhou for five years agreed with Hu.
一位已在广州作业五年的匿名医师对胡星斗的观念表明认同。

Under the current evaluation system, he needs to publish two papers and a research project to become an associate chief physician.
在现行的评价系统下，他需求宣布两篇论文以及并完结一项研讨课题，才干成为副主任医师。

“It is like a mission impossible. As a clinician, I work five days a week from dawn to dusk. This is a public hospital and I always work overtime. It would be extremely difficult for me to write papers,” he told Xinhua News Agency.
“这就像个不可能完结的使命。作为一名临床医师，我一周五天从早到晚都要作业。这是家公立医院，我常常要加班。要写论文对我来说几乎比登天还难，”他在承受新华社采访时表明。

Hu suggested that to reduce academic dishonesty, Chinese academia should focus more on quality and make peer reviews public.
胡星斗主张，为削减学术失期，我国学界应当更多地重视（论文）质量，并将同行评议公诸于众。

In December, the National Natural Science Foundation of China disclosed several cases of scientific misconduct in an effort to reduce academic dishonesty.
上一年12月，国家天然科学基金委员会披露了几宗科研不端事例，力求削减学术失期。

“There is no excuse in any case for academic fraud. Academic misconduct should be seriously dealt with,” Zhao Zijian, an expert working for China’s national “Thousand Talent” program, told Xinhua.
“任何情况都不构成学术造假的理由。学术不端应当被严肃处理，”我国“千人方案”特聘专家赵子健在承受新华社采访时表明。